Walking on Shifting Sands

The education secretary changes. The curriculum shifts. Technology evolves. Funding cuts bite. Demographics shift. And just when you think you’ve got your footing, along comes another “revolutionary” initiative that promises to transform everything. Again.

If you’re leading change in education right now, you’re probably feeling like you’re trying to build a house during an earthquake. Every time you lay a foundation, the ground moves beneath you. Every strategic plan feels obsolete even before the ink dries. Every staff meeting begins with someone asking, “So what’s changing now?”

I’ve been there. We’ve all been there. The temptation is to wait for the tremors to stop, for things to ‘settle down’ before making any significant moves. But there's an uncomfortable truth: the ground isn’t going to stop shifting. The question isn’t how to find stable ground, but how to lead effectively whilst the earth moves beneath our feet.

This isn’t about crisis management or reactive firefighting. It’s about developing a fundamentally different approach to change leadership - one that thrives in uncertainty rather than merely surviving it. It’s about becoming what the ancient Stoics might have called “the steady centre in the storm” - not immune to change, but grounded in principles that transcend the chaos.

Stop Chasing Permanence: The Futility of Waiting for Stability

The first mindset shift is brutal but liberating: stop expecting stable ground. We’re conditioned to believe that good change management requires a solid foundation, clear timelines, and predictable outcomes. But education in 2025 doesn’t work that way.

We only need to consider the last five years in English education alone. We’ve navigated COVID-19 disruptions, multiple changes in government policy, the introduction of new GCSE and A-Level specifications, evolving Ofsted frameworks (watch this space again!), shifts in university admissions, the AI revolution in classrooms, and ongoing debates about assessment and accountability. That’s not an unusual period - that’s the new normal.

Psychologist Carol Dweck’s research on growth mindset offers crucial insights here. (I know I mention her work a lot but I don’t apologise for it because it has had such a profound impact on me and I think it resonates in lots of places!) Dweck found that people who embrace challenges and view setbacks as opportunities for learning consistently outperform those who seek certainty and avoid risk. In her words:

“In a growth mindset, challenges are exciting rather than threatening. So rather than thinking, oh, I’m going to reveal my weaknesses, you say, wow, here’s a chance to grow.” Carol Dweck

This principle applies directly to educational leadership. The schools that thrive aren’t those that resist change or wait for stability - they’re the ones that have developed what we might call “adaptive capacity”. They’ve learned to see constant change not as a problem to be solved, but as a condition to be navigated.

“Organisations that do not continually change will die.” Vijay Govindarajan

We can just look at the example of Michaela Community School in London. Love them or loathe them (and you’ll probably guess my opinion!), their approach demonstrates something important about permanence. Rather than chasing every educational trend, they’ve anchored themselves to core principles about knowledge, discipline, and high expectations. When external pressures mount - and they do, regularly - they evaluate changes against these fixed principles rather than abandoning their approach entirely. (That has led them to stay fixed to some “interesting” methods but in some ways, it is working - especially if the key measure is student academic performance - which I don’t think it is, but that’s a different story!)

This isn’t about being stubborn or resistant to good ideas. It’s about recognising that in a world of constant flux, your role as a leader isn’t to predict the future or find solid ground. It’s to help others walk on shifting sands with balance, clarity, and direction. 

The philosopher Heraclitus understood this 2,500 years ago when he observed that “no man ever steps in the same river twice.” The river is always changing, always moving. The skill lies not in stopping the flow but in learning to navigate the current. In education, we need leaders who can help their communities ford the river, not ones who stand on the bank waiting for it to stop flowing.

Build Clarity, Not Certainty: Anchoring in Values When Facts Keep Changing

When everything changes, certainty becomes not just elusive but actively misleading. What you can offer - and what your community desperately needs - is clarity. There’s a crucial difference between the two, and understanding it transforms how you lead.

Certainty is about outcomes: “If we implement this programme, our results will improve by X%.” Clarity is about purpose: “We’re implementing this programme because we believe every child deserves access to rich, challenging content.” Certainty pretends to know the future; clarity knows what matters regardless of what the future brings.

Viktor Frankl, the Austrian neurologist and Holocaust survivor (who again I refer to in pretty much every newsletter these days!) captured this distinction in his seminal work Man’s Search for Meaning, still one of the most important books I’ve ever read. Frankl observed that those who survived the concentration camps weren’t necessarily the physically strongest, but those who maintained a clear sense of purpose even when their circumstances were utterly unpredictable. He wrote:

“Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms - to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.” Viktor Frankl

This principle applies powerfully to educational leadership. When policy shifts, when budgets shrink, when new initiatives arrive, your team doesn’t need you to pretend you know exactly how things will work out. They need you to articulate clearly why you’re doing what you’re doing and how it connects to your shared values.

I’ve seen this play out repeatedly in schools across the UK and further afield. During the pandemic, the headteachers who maintained trust and morale weren’t those who claimed to know how long lockdowns would last or exactly what remote learning would achieve. They were the ones who consistently communicated their commitment to student wellbeing, educational equity, and community support, regardless of the format “delivery” took.

In fact, I was blessed to be a governor at Moor End County Primary School during this time. My daughters attended this school and I saw first hand how the headteacher delivered food parcels, teachers started taking round packs of printed materials to help learners (but not just worksheets - fun stuff too), and the whole community supporting each other through real tough times. Andy, the head, didn’t profess to understand Google Classroom, but he brought clarity to his team: we serve our people. 

But clarity isn’t just about grand mission statements stuck on walls with a lovely decal. It’s about making your decision-making process transparent and consistent. When staff understand the principles guiding your choices, they can better navigate uncertainty themselves. They begin to internalise the framework, making it easier to maintain coherence even when you’re not in the room.

This approach requires what psychologist Amos Tversky called “constructive dialogue with uncertainty.” Rather than pretending we know more than we do, we acknowledge the limits of our knowledge while remaining clear about our convictions. It’s the difference between saying “This new assessment system will definitely improve outcomes” and “We’re piloting this assessment approach because it aligns with our belief that feedback should be timely, specific, and focused on growth.”

The clarity comes not from eliminating uncertainty but from being transparent about how you’re thinking through it.

Be a Translator: Making the Abstract Concrete in an Information-Saturated World

New policy arrives monthly. EdTech solutions multiply daily, especially now those two letters are everywhere. Research findings flood social media. Academic theories compete for attention. Your staff are drowning in information, but what they’re starving for is translation. They don’t need more data - they need someone who can answer the question: “What does this actually mean for me, my students, and my daily practice?”

This is where educational leaders can become genuinely indispensable. Not by being the smartest person in the room, but by being the best interpreter in the building.

I am reminded about the introduction of the new Relationships and Sex Education curriculum in England. The policy documents were dense, the guidance was broad, and the implementation timeline was tight. Schools that struggled were often those where leadership simply forwarded the DfE documents to staff with a note saying “Please implement by September.” Schools that succeeded had leaders who translated the policy into practical questions: “How does this affect our Year 7 PSHE programme? Which topics need additional resources? What conversations do we need to have with parents? Where might staff need training?”

The anthropologist Clifford Geertz wrote about the importance of “thick description" - the ability to interpret cultural symbols and make meaning accessible to others, something I learned about just a few years ago. In schools, leaders serve as cultural interpreters, helping their communities make sense of the constant stream of external demands and internal pressures.

This translation work operates at multiple levels. At the macro level, it’s about helping staff understand how national policies connect to local realities. When the government announces changes to teacher training or accountability measures, your role isn’t just to relay the information but to contextualise it: “Here’s what this means for our department structure. Here’s how it affects our recruitment plans. Here’s what we need to start thinking about now.” But also, based on the clarity point earlier, “How does this align with our values?”

At the micro level, it’s about making abstract concepts concrete. Even something like the ubiquitous focus on “metacognition" in education. Most teachers know they should be developing students’ metacognitive skills, but many aren’t clear on what this looks like in practice. Effective leaders translate this into specific, observable actions: “When you’re teaching long division, pause after the first example and ask students to explain their thinking. When they’re writing essays, have them reflect on their planning process. When they’re struggling with a concept, teach them to ask ‘What part of this am I finding difficult?’”

The abstract can become concrete. 

Daniel Kahneman’s work on cognitive biases offers another lens for understanding this translation challenge. He identified the “curse of knowledge” - once we know something, we find it difficult to imagine not knowing it. Educational leaders often fall into this trap, assuming that their understanding of policy implications or pedagogical principles is shared by their staff.

Effective translation requires what Kahneman called “thinking, fast and slow” (great book, by the way). It’s the ability to step back from immediate understanding and consider how information lands with different audiences. It means asking not just “Do I understand this?” but “How will a newly qualified teacher interpret this? How will a head of department with 20 years’ experience react? What will parents make of this change?”

The best educational leaders I’ve encountered operate like skilled simultaneous interpreters. They can take the language of policy-makers, researchers, and theorists and render it into the practical vocabulary of classroom teachers. They bridge the gap between the abstract and the applied, the theoretical and the tactical.

Embrace Micro-Pilots: Testing Ideas in an Uncertain World

When the ground keeps shifting, attempting full-scale implementation of new initiatives isn’t just risky, it’s often counterproductive. Instead, successful change leaders in education are embracing what Silicon Valley has long understood: the power of the pilot programme, the minimum viable product, the controlled experiment.

But we’re not talking about corporate-style “innovation labs” disconnected from real practice. We’re talking about embedded, practical micro-pilots that allow you to test ideas with willing participants before committing whole departments or year groups to unproven approaches.

The psychological principle behind this approach draws from Albert Bandura’s work on self-efficacy. Bandura found that people’s belief in their ability to succeed is strongest when it’s built through “mastery experiences” which are the successful completion of challenging but achievable tasks. In education, this means starting with small wins rather than overwhelming staff with large-scale changes.

This has become super important recently in the work I do helping schools, colleges and trusts with integration of AI tools into their teaching practice. Rather than mandating ChatGPT training for all staff or investing in expensive school-wide licenses, I suggest starting with five volunteer teachers across different subjects. These early adopters spend a term experimenting with AI-assisted lesson planning, assessment feedback, and resource creation. They document what works, what doesn’t, and what support they need.

The results are always telling. Not every experiment succeeds - some AI-generated resources are woeful, and certain applications prove more distracting than helpful. But these pilots always generate practical insights that no amount of theoretical training could provide. More importantly, it can create a cadre of informed practitioners who can share realistic expectations with colleagues, rather than evangelical enthusiasm or blanket rejection.

This approach is about small wins - the concrete, complete outcomes that signal progress without requiring massive resource commitments. In uncertain environments like we are talking about, small wins serve multiple psychological functions: they build momentum, provide learning opportunities, and maintain morale when larger victories seem distant.

The key to effective micro-pilots isn’t just their size but their intentionality. Random experimentation leads to random results. Effective pilots test specific hypotheses about what might work in your context. They include clear success criteria, defined timescales, and structured reflection processes.

Let’s take an example of a primary school that wants to improve their approach to mathematical reasoning. Rather than overhauling their entire maths curriculum, they could pilot a new questioning technique with Year 4 for six weeks. Three teachers use the approach while three continue with their existing methods. They will track not just student outcomes but teacher workload, student engagement, and resource requirements.

It’s likely that alongside the usual findings, we would see the new questioning technique works for confident mathematicians but might overwhelm struggling learners. This insight can help to modify the approach based on student need, something they would never have discovered through whole-school implementation.

This experimental mindset also helps with psychological safety as it develops the belief that one can speak up, ask questions, and make mistakes without fear of negative consequences. When staff know they’re part of a pilot rather than a permanent change, they’re more likely to give honest feedback and suggest improvements.

The ancient Greek concept of phronesis - practical wisdom - applies here. Unlike theoretical knowledge, phronesis can only be developed through experience, through trying things out in real contexts with real constraints. Micro-pilots create the conditions for phronesis to emerge, allowing you to develop contextual understanding that no external expert can provide.

Cultivate Adaptive Trust: Building Confidence Through Uncertainty

Trust in educational leadership traditionally meant being right, having answers, and demonstrating competence through certainty. But when the ground keeps shifting, this model breaks down. You can’t build trust by pretending to know what you don’t know. Instead, you need to cultivate what we might call “adaptive trust” - my confidence in your ability to navigate uncertainty together. It’s also about knowing that trust changes and isn’t a fixed concept. 

This requires a fundamental shift in how we think about leadership credibility. Rather than being built on infallibility, adaptive trust is built on reliability, transparency, and shared learning. It’s the difference between “trust me because I have all the answers” and “trust me because I’ll figure this out with you.”

The psychologist John Gottman’s research on relationships offers valuable insights here. Gottman found that successful long-term relationships aren’t characterised by the absence of conflict or uncertainty, but by how partners navigate difficulties together. He identified “emotional intelligence” as a key factor - the ability to recognise, understand, and respond appropriately to emotional dynamics during challenging times.

Educational leadership requires similar emotional intelligence. When policy changes land on your desk, when budgets get cut, when new challenges emerge, your team is watching not just what you do but how you respond emotionally. Do you project calm confidence or anxious uncertainty? Do you acknowledge the difficulty or minimise it? Do you involve others in problem-solving or retreat into isolation?

This approach draws from what philosopher Emmanuel Levinas called “ethical responsibility” which is the recognition that our leadership exists in relationship with others, not above them. When leaders acknowledge their limitations while maintaining their commitment to shared goals, they create more of that psychological safety and the confidence that it’s safe to be open, to ask questions, and to admit when things aren’t working.

Adaptive trust also requires what I call “productive vulnerability". This isn’t about emotional oversharing or dumping your anxiety on your team. It’s about modelling how to engage constructively with uncertainty. When a new government initiative lands and you’re not sure how it will work in practice, saying “I’m not certain about the details yet, but here’s how we’ll figure it out together” builds more trust than pretending you’ve got it all sorted.

The neuroscientist Antonio Damasio’s research on decision-making reveals why this approach works. Damasio found that emotions play a crucial role in how we process information and make choices. When leaders try to project artificial certainty, it creates cognitive dissonance and people sense the disconnect between what’s being said and what’s being felt.

“Emotions and the feelings are not a luxury, they are a means of communicating our states of mind to others. But they are also a way of guiding our own judgments and decisions. Emotions bring the body into the loop of reason.” Antonio Damasio

But adaptive trust isn’t just about emotional honesty. It’s also about operational reliability. In uncertain times, people need to know that whilst outcomes might be unpredictable, processes will be consistent. This means maintaining regular communication rhythms, honouring commitments, and following through on promises even when circumstances change.

During the pandemic, the schools that maintained highest staff morale weren’t necessarily those with the best resources or clearest guidance from the government. They were the ones where leadership maintained predictable communication patterns, acknowledged the emotional toll of constant change, and involved staff in problem-solving rather than imposing solutions from above.

Make Sense of the Noise: Pattern Recognition in an Information-Rich World

The job of a change leader in education isn’t to predict the future but to sense patterns in the present and act with intelligence based on emerging trends. It’s why we write our Edufuturists Trends booklets each year. In our information-saturated environment, this skill of “signal detection” becomes crucial for effective leadership.

The temptation is either to react to every new initiative or announcement or to ignore most of it. Neither approach serves your community well. What’s needed is sophisticated pattern recognition - the ability to distinguish between temporary noise and significant signals.

This concept draws from information theory, particularly the work of Claude Shannon on signal-to-noise ratios. In any communication system, there’s useful information (signal) and random interference (noise). The challenge for educational leaders is developing filters that help identify which developments represent genuine signals worth attending to.

It’s pertinent in the emergence of artificial intelligence in education. For the past two years, we’ve been bombarded with both breathless excitement about AI’s transformative potential and dire warnings about its threats to academic integrity. Effective leaders haven’t simply jumped on either bandwagon. Instead, they’ve been tracking the underlying patterns: which AI applications are actually proving useful in classrooms, how students are really using these tools, what skills employers are beginning to expect.

Daniel Kahneman (again!) and economist Amos Tversky’s work on cognitive biases offers crucial insights again here. They identified “availability bias” - our tendency to judge the likelihood of events based on how easily we can remember examples. In education, this means we often overreact to vivid recent examples whilst missing more significant but less dramatic trends.

For instance, a single negative news story about social media’s impact on student mental health (or an MIT study on GenerativeAI and thinking skills!) might generate more leadership attention than gradually accumulating evidence about effective wellbeing interventions. Skilled leaders develop what we might call systematic attention, as more structured ways of gathering and analysing information that resist the pull of whatever happens to be most prominent today.

This requires building what intelligence analysts call ‘mental models’ or frameworks for understanding how different factors interact within complex systems. In education, this means understanding how demographic changes, technological developments, economic pressures, and political shifts combine to create challenges and opportunities.

It’s possibly worth thinking about this in terms of teacher recruitment and retention. Rather than simply reacting to immediate staffing crises, effective leaders are tracking multiple trend lines: university teacher training numbers, early career retention rates, regional salary competition, workload research, and policy changes affecting the profession. By monitoring these patterns over time, they can anticipate pressures and develop proactive responses rather than reactive fixes.

Rather than claiming certainty about future trends, effective leaders develop hypotheses about what patterns might mean and test these ideas through small-scale actions. They remain open to being wrong whilst acting on their best current understanding.

This approach also requires “cultural capital” or the knowledge, skills, and networks that help you understand how your field actually works. For educational leaders, this means staying connected to multiple information sources: practitioner networks, research communities, policy circles, and international developments.

But pattern recognition isn’t just about consuming more information - it’s about developing better analytical habits. This includes regularly reading outside your immediate field, engaging with people who see things differently, and maintaining what Zen Buddhists call “beginner’s mind”. It’s the humility to recognise that your current understanding might be incomplete.

The most effective educational leaders I know operate like skilled meteorologists. They don’t claim to predict exactly when storms will hit, but they understand pressure systems, track multiple data sources, and can sense when conditions are building toward significant weather events. They help their communities prepare for likely scenarios whilst remaining adaptable when unexpected developments arise.

Give Language to Emotion: The Psychology of Change Resistance

Much of what we label as “resistance to change” in education isn’t actually about the change itself. It’s about the emotions that change provokes - fear, grief, fatigue, uncertainty - and our collective inability to name and discuss these feelings in professional contexts.

This insight is definitely taken from the work of psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, who identified the stages of grief that people experience when facing significant loss. While her model has been critiqued and refined over the decades, the core insight remains powerful: change involves loss, and loss generates predictable emotional responses that need to be acknowledged and worked through. But as many current thinkers keep saying, “Change happens when the pain of staying the same is greater than the pain of change.”

In education, every change involves multiple losses. A new curriculum means saying goodbye to familiar resources and established practices. A restructure means losing comfortable relationships and predictable routines. New technology means admitting that skills you’ve developed over years might become obsolete. These aren’t just practical adjustments; they’re emotional experiences that affect how people respond to change initiatives.

The psychologist William Bridges made an important distinction between “change” (external events) and “transition” (internal psychological processes). He argued that most change initiatives fail not because the external changes are poorly designed, but because leaders ignore the internal transitions that people need to make. In his words:

“It isn’t the changes that do you in, it’s the transitions. Change is not the same as transition. Change is situational: the new site, the new boss, the new team roles, the new policy. Transition is the psychological process people go through to come to terms with the new situation.” William Bridges

This psychological understanding transforms how we approach change leadership. Instead of simply announcing new initiatives and expecting compliance, effective leaders create space for the emotional work of transition. They acknowledge that feeling uncertain, frustrated, or overwhelmed doesn’t mean someone is “resistant” - it means they’re human.

I spoke recently with one headteacher who introduced a new assessment system. Rather than beginning with training sessions on the technical features, she started with what she called “transition conversations”. She asked staff to reflect on what they would miss about the old system, what they were worried about with the new one, and what support they thought they’d need during the changeover.

These conversations revealed concerns that purely technical training would never have addressed. Some teachers were worried about increased workload during an already demanding term. Others felt anxious about learning new technology when they were still catching up from previous changes. Several expressed grief about losing assessment approaches they’d spent years developing and felt proud of.

By naming these emotions explicitly, the headteacher transformed the change process. Instead of underground grumbling and passive resistance, she created structured opportunities for people to voice concerns and receive support. The technical training became more effective because the emotional groundwork had been laid.

This approach draws from the field of emotional intelligence, particularly the work of psychologist Marc Brackett. Brackett’s research shows that people’s ability to recognise, understand, label, express, and regulate emotions directly affects their performance, relationships, and wellbeing. In change processes, this means helping people develop what he calls “emotional granularity” - precise language for describing internal experiences.

Rather than allowing emotions to remain vague and unnamed - “I don’t like this new system” - effective leaders help people become more specific: “I’m feeling overwhelmed by learning new procedures while managing my regular workload” or “I’m grieving the loss of assessment approaches I’d become expert in” or “I’m anxious about whether I’ll be able to maintain the same quality of feedback for students.”

This emotional granularity serves multiple purposes. It helps people feel heard and understood. It identifies specific problems that can be addressed through practical support. And it normalises the reality that professional change involves personal emotion - something that British educational culture often struggles to acknowledge.

My favourite anthropologist Brené Brown’s research on vulnerability offers additional insights. Brown found that organisational cultures that suppress difficult emotions don’t eliminate them - they drive them underground, where they manifest as passive resistance, cynicism, and disengagement. In contrast, cultures that create safe spaces for emotional expression tend to be more resilient and adaptive.

“When the culture of an organisation mandates that it is more important to protect the reputation of a system and those in power than it is to protect the basic human dignity of individuals or communities, you can be certain that shame is systemic, money drives ethics, and accountability is dead.” Brené Brown

Creating this kind of emotional safety requires what psychologist Carl Rogers called “unconditional positive regard” - the ability to separate the person from their response. When someone expresses frustration about a new initiative, effective leaders can acknowledge the emotion without taking it personally or becoming defensive.

Taking the Guide’s Role: Leadership for Uncertain Times

In ancient times, when travellers needed to cross treacherous terrain, they didn’t look for leaders who claimed to know exactly what lay ahead. They sought guides - people who understood the landscape, could read the signs, and had the skills to navigate uncertainty safely. I heard Hywel Roberts talk about teachers and leaders as sherpa and that really resonated.

This metaphor captures something essential about educational leadership in our current context. The best leaders aren’t those who pretend to be mapmakers, claiming to know the exact route to success. They’re the guides - calm, curious, and committed to helping others move forward, one steady step at a time.

This shift in metaphor isn’t just poetic - it represents a fundamental change in how we think about leadership capability. Traditional leadership models emphasised vision-setting, decision-making, and strategic planning. These remain important, but they’re insufficient when the terrain keeps changing. Guide-like leadership adds different skills: situational awareness, adaptive thinking, and the ability to maintain group morale during difficult passages.

The educationalist John Dewey understood this when he wrote about education as “growth through experience.” Dewey argued that learning happens not through absorbing predetermined knowledge but through intelligent engagement with uncertain situations. The same principle applies to leading through uncertainty - it’s not about having pre-existing answers but about developing the capacity to think clearly under pressure.

This approach draws from what military strategists call “mission command”. This is the practice of giving subordinates clear intent and broad autonomy rather than detailed instructions. When situations change rapidly, detailed plans become liabilities. What matters is shared understanding of purpose and the confidence to adapt approaches based on emerging circumstances.

In education, this might mean establishing clear principles about student wellbeing and academic growth while remaining flexible about the specific methods used to achieve these goals. It means developing teams who understand the “why” deeply enough to make good decisions when the ‘how’ needs to change.

The neuroscientist Arne Dietrich’s research on creativity offers insights into why this approach works. Dietrich found that innovative solutions often emerge when we reduce our reliance on established patterns and increase our tolerance for ambiguity. Leaders who embrace uncertainty create conditions where creative solutions can emerge from their teams rather than trying to solve every problem themselves.

A distributed approach to problem-solving reflects what complexity theorists call “emergent strategy” - the recognition that in complex systems, the best solutions often arise from local adaptation rather than central planning. It requires leaders who are comfortable with the ability to remain in uncertainty without irritably reaching after fact and reason.

But guide-like leadership isn’t passive. Guides make decisions, take action, and provide direction. The difference is that they remain constantly attuned to changing conditions and adjust their approach accordingly. They combine what the ancient Greeks called sophia (wisdom) with the other Greek word I mentioned earlier, phronesis (practical judgement). This is deep understanding combined with contextual sensitivity.

The story of Ernest Shackleton’s leadership during the Endurance expedition offers a powerful example. When his ship became trapped in Antarctic ice, Shackleton couldn’t follow his original plan to cross the continent. Instead, he adapted his mission to keeping his crew alive and maintaining morale during nearly two years of uncertainty. His leadership during this crisis has become legendary not because he predicted what would happen, but because he navigated unpredictability with calm determination and unwavering care for his people.

Educational leaders facing constant change need similar qualities. Not the ability to predict the future, but the skills to navigate uncertainty whilst maintaining focus on what matters most: the growth and wellbeing of the young people in their care.

The Path Forward

These seven principles aren’t just theoretical frameworks for me. I think they’re practical tools for navigating the reality of modern educational leadership. But implementing them requires a fundamental shift in how we think about our role. We’re not fortune tellers or master planners. We’re guides helping our communities move forward through uncertain terrain.

This shift isn’t easy. It means embracing discomfort, admitting ignorance, and finding strength in vulnerability. It means building cultures where saying “I don’t know, but here’s how we’ll figure it out” is seen as leadership, not weakness. The ground will keep shifting. New policies will arrive. Technologies will evolve. Societal pressures will mount. But if we can learn to walk steadily on unstable terrain and help others do the same, we’ll discover something liberating: uncertainty isn’t the enemy of good leadership. It’s simply the context in which all real leadership happens.

The question isn’t whether the ground will stop moving. It’s whether we’ll learn to dance with the tremors or keep waiting for the earthquake to end. The best educational leaders aren’t those who predict the future. They are almost always those who help their communities thrive regardless of what the future brings.

So stop chasing permanence. Build clarity, not certainty. Translate the complex into the practical. Test ideas before committing to them. Earn trust through honesty, not omniscience. Make sense of the signals amidst the noise. And give people language for the very real emotions that change provokes.

These aren’t just strategies for managing change but the foundations for leading with wisdom when the only constant is uncertainty itself.

‍
​​1. Stop chasing permanence
The first mindset shift is brutal but freeing: stop expecting stable ground. We often wait for things to “settle down” before implementing change but in modern education, that moment never comes. Your role is not to find solid ground, but to help others walk on shifting sands with balance, clarity, and direction.

2. Build clarity, not certainty
When everything changes, certainty becomes a lie. What you can offer is clarity: about values, purpose, and priorities. Anchor your team to why you're doing what you're doing. Clear principles trump reactive plans.

3. Be a translator
New policy? New tech? New leadership? Most educators don’t need more information - they need translation. What does this really mean for me, my students, my workload? If you can make the abstract concrete, and the complex digestible, you become indispensable.

4. Embrace micro-pilots
Trying to roll out full-scale change in chaos is asking for resistance. Instead, pilot small. Test ideas with a few willing staff or classes. Gather feedback. Iterate. When the world is uncertain, experimentation is more honest than perfection.

5. Cultivate adaptive trust
Trust isn’t built by being right all the time. It’s built by showing up consistently, owning mistakes, and communicating openly. Your team will tolerate uncertainty if they trust you’re steering with integrity.

6. Make sense of the noise
The job of a change leader isn’t to predict the future, but to sense patterns in the noise and act with intelligence. Read widely, listen closely, and share insights regularly. You don’t need to have all the answers, but you do need to be curious and plugged in.

7. Give language to emotion
Much resistance to change is rooted in fear, grief, or fatigue, not logic. Validate it. Name it. Make it discussable. A staffroom where people can say “I’m overwhelmed and unsure” without judgement is a staffroom ready for transformation.

So, in a shifting landscape, the best leaders don’t pretend to be the mapmakers. They become the guides - calm, curious, and committed to helping others move forward, one steady step at a time.